skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The McMinnville/Trent photo of 1950 and the 1954 Rouen, France photo were provided in "In the air Collectibles and UFOs 1968" Minion 24].The evenness is clear.The Trent photo(s) -- donate were two, as you get it -- back been calculated hoaxes by assured (Robert Sheaffer on top) and genuine by others (Bruce Maccabee, David Rudiak).The Rouen photo, in use by a French Air Shove pilot, has gnerally been calculated to be genuine.But doesn't the Rouen photo sponsor the Trent photo and sighting of four time earlier?Martin J. Powell offers a correct journal of the two photographs which can be figure out by clicking Now.Mr. Powell noted that donate is a mistrust about the genuine date of the Rouen photo, citing Vicente Juan Ballester-Olmos' corrected dating of 1957, and VJB's insinuation that the Rouen photo was a doctored shape of the Trent UFO photo, all the same the Rouen photo contains upper detail than the Trent UFO photo -- which is a relation impossibility if one is initiation a shape of a photo; the new photo force be dishonored not outstanding.As when other UFO photos or incidents, the details are eternally compromised by no matter which iffy; in this case the date of the Rouen photo and the insinuation by a bona fide UFO party worker -- Ballester-Olmos -- that the Rouen photo was a shape.Yes, donate are endorsed questions about the Trent photos -- addressed by Phil Klass and others, such as why they didn't become adult their film for assured time if, inevitable, they rumination they had captured a flying saucer.But if the Rouen photo is genuine -- all the same that seems to be up in the air after that -- doesn't it donation support to the Trent photos?And, as we usually ask, were donate other sightings and/or photos when the air-foil arrangement that is peculiar to these photographs -- either otherwise 1950 or after 1954/1957?While assured cutback pursuing such sightings, from hope for ago -- we are of that ilk ourselves, usually -- the "saucer" seen in these two photos create a center of attention retro-investigation....to sponsor the Trent photos and to show that flying saucers of the 1950s time-frame ding to back had tangibility, and aero-dynamic character, which is no longer the case.Today's UFOs are indistinct commonly, lacking gist or materiality.To the same extent happened to UFOs?Why back they changed?RR
Reference: ufo-chronicles.blogspot.com
