Monday, June 30, 2008
White House Et Petition Letdown Part 2
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Eric Davis Physicist Explains Why Scientists Wont Discuss Their Ufo Interests
BUT THAT ATTITUDE IS CHANGING, AND MANY SCIENTISTS ARE JOINING THE DISCUSSION WITHOUT FEAR OF RIDICULE
"UFOs are real phenomena. They are artificial objects under intelligent control. They're definitely the craft of a supremely advanced technology," says physicist Eric Davis, a researcher of light-speed travel.Davis, a research physicist at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin, studies propulsion physics, which he hopes will one day allow humans to travel easily and quickly through our galactic neighborhood.He's aware of the public perception -- mostly from skeptics and debunkers -- that no legitimate scientists would ever touch the subject of UFOs.
"They're wrong, naive, stubborn, narrow-minded, afraid and fearful. It's a dirty word and a forbidden topic. Science is about open-minded inquiry. You shouldn't be laughing off people. You should show more deference and respect to them... Scientists need to get back to using the scientific method to study things that are unknown and unusual, and the UFO subject is one of them."
Davis is one of several scientists who are presenting their views this weekend on a variety of UFO-related topics at the 2013 MUFON Symposium in Las Vegas.
The physicist, who recently won an award from the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics for his study, "Faster-Than-Light Space Warps, Status and Next Steps," knows many colleagues who quietly study UFOs.
"There are scientists who are aware of evidence and observational data that is not refutable. It is absolutely corroborated, using forensic techniques and methodology. But they won't come out and publicize that because they fear it. Not the subject -- they fear the backlash from their professional colleagues. The impact on their career might be detrimental and they'd get bad publicity.
"It's not an acceptable, funded line of research. The National Science Foundation does not accept UFOs as a subject for scientific study."
It may come as a surprise that many scientists have been interested in UFOs for decades.
For 20 years, astronomer J. Allen Hynek was the U.S. Air Force scientific consultant on UFOs during its famous Project Blue Book UFO study that ended in 1969.
Davis believes that the domain for UFO investigations doesn't really belong in the hands of scientists.
"It's the domain of military intelligence," he suggests. "The fact that [unknown] craft are flying around Earth is not a subject for science -- it's a subject for intelligence-gathering, collection and analysis. That's because UFOs are not a natural phenomenon, and that's what science studies."
Source
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Quantum Computing And Ufos
"The New Yorker" magazine has an article in its May 2nd, 2011 issue that may be legal to the watching of UFOs: Swanky Set-up by Rivka Galchen, Buzz 34 ff.
David Deutsch, who wrote "The Significant of Accuracy" and "The Exterior of Time without end", may not be curious in UFOs per se, but he does award insights about quantum mechanics, computing, physics and science, on the whole, which may perhaps be second hand by unmanageable UFO researchers to address that full of loopholes enigma.
Deutsch is the main delegation to the suspicion of quantum computing, which he suggests can address the Complex Worlds/Universes presumption, while giving out explanation of quantum's theories of superposition and embarrassing situation, that award a UFO connection conceivably.
If precise of you are about to to conjecture, intellectually, about the UFO mystery, you would do well to illuminate the New Yorker carrying out. It determination award grist for primary ruminations.
David Deutsch, who wrote "The Significant of Accuracy" and "The Exterior of Time without end", may not be curious in UFOs per se, but he does award insights about quantum mechanics, computing, physics and science, on the whole, which may perhaps be second hand by unmanageable UFO researchers to address that full of loopholes enigma.
Deutsch is the main delegation to the suspicion of quantum computing, which he suggests can address the Complex Worlds/Universes presumption, while giving out explanation of quantum's theories of superposition and embarrassing situation, that award a UFO connection conceivably.
If precise of you are about to to conjecture, intellectually, about the UFO mystery, you would do well to illuminate the New Yorker carrying out. It determination award grist for primary ruminations.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Amherst Ufo Jan 2013 Gets A Government Cover Up
COMPUTER GRAPHIC LIKENESS
"MOST PEOPLE THAT WITNESSED THIS EVENT IN THE TOWN OF AMHERST BELIEVE THAT SAW A UFO AND NOT A MILITARY AIRCRAFT IN JANUARY 2013. THE FOLKS OF AMHERST ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE COMINGS AND GOINGS OF MILITARY AIRCRAFT AS THE WESTOVER RESERVE BASE IS JUST A STONES THROW AWAY. THE FAA ORIGINALLY ANNOUNCED THAT THIS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN A MILITARY AIRCRAFT BECAUSE NOTHING WAS SCHEDULED TO BE IN THE AIR. IT BECAME THE TALK OF THE TOWN AND IT WAS CLEARLY APPARENT THAT THERE WERE MORE THAN ENOUGH WITNESSES QUESTIONING WHAT THEY SAW IN THE SKY. "
"THE STORY SLOWLY CHANGED, AS WE HAVE SEEN WITH NUMEROUS OTHER UFO SIGHTINGS, THE MILITARY AND THE FAA RETRACTED THEIR ORIGINAL STATEMENTS AND NOW THEY SAY THERE WAS A C-5 CARGO AIRCRAFT IN THE AREA. THE PROBLEM WITH THIS IS THAT YOU HAVE AN ENTIRE TOWN THAT IS EXTREMELY FAMILIAR WITH THE C-5 (ONE EVEN CRASHED 3 YRS AGO) AIRCRAFT AND THEY SAY THIS IS NOT WHAT THEY SAW. THE MILITARY KNOWS THAT EVEN THOUGH THEIR 'COVER STORY' IS WEAK IT WILL WORK. MOST PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO STEP OUT OF THEIR COMFORT ZONE AND WILL READILY BELIEVE WHATEVER STORY IS PUT FORWARD BY THE 'OFFICIAL SOURCES'. CHANGING SOMEONES REALITY FOR THE BETTER OR WORSE IS ONE OF THE HARDEST THINGS ON THE PLANET TO ACCOMPLISH. HERE IS A LINK TO THE ORIGINAL AMHERST UFO STORY."
I WAS DRIVING MY DAUGHTER TO SWIM TEAM PRACTICE ONE RECENT NIGHT WHEN WE SAW SOMETHING CURIOUS FLY RIGHT OVER THE ROAD NEAR THE AMHERST LANDFILL ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF TOWN.
"That is one weird plane," I said, referring to the cargo planes that we see all the time flying down to the Westover Air Reserve Base in Chicopee. This was much smaller though, and flew much lower, with most unsual lights. It made not a sound.
"It's a UFO," Hattie said to me. She's 11. "Wow," I said, and I thought little about it until my neighbor rang me up a few days later. "I've got some exciting news," she exclaimed. "Belchertown Road was visited by aliens the other night. Perhaps you should prepare the backyard so they can land."
There's two-and-a-half acres back there, some of which is clear of trees. She is Russian. "No kidding?" I said, and recalled reading about a factory town east of Moscow where panicked citizens stripped shelves of matches, sugar and candles anticipating the Mayan apocalypse in December.
Sure enough, turning on the news, the UFO was all over: the television, the newspaper, on the Internet. Residents reported strange lights and objects. Officials said there was no plane in the sky over town that night.
I called my mother. She's actually seen a UFO or two. "Millions of people have seen them," she said. "The government always denies it. We saw something," I said.
My son overheard us and said he saw it, too. Turns out he was a mile south of my daughter and I, driving with my wife that night. Triangular in shape, much smaller than the C-5s, flying low, making no sound, he agreed. "I watched it for like five minutes," he said.
"Do you think it was a UFO," I asked.
CBS 3 SPRINGFIELD - WSHM
"Definitely not a plane," he said. "Probably a drone."
We didn't have unmanned aircraft when I was a kid. I called my father, an engineer. He offered an idea: "The military might have buried some radioactive material in the landfill there and were testing their drone to see if it could detect it."
Huh? Even dad is coming up with something. I thought about how we terrestrials explain the explainable.
Three years ago, one of those enormous C-5s lost two of its 28 wheels, both of which landed in the woods not but a mile away from our home. The plane is the largest aircraft on the planet. The airbase eventually came by to claim the wheels and apologized, but my children and I began looking more closely when those planes flew overhead.
Then, I remembered one Easter eve back when my daughter Hattie was 3 years old.
She looked at her mother and I, her eyes wide, and asked, "Will the Easter bunny come into my room?"
We grinned. Our daughter's imagination had taken over and the mythical bunny had suddenly become real, even menacing, with ears and a hat perhaps, creeping through the house at night, even into her room while she was fast asleep.
She believed. In much the same way the media told us that what we collectively saw had foundation in reality: we believed.
A few weeks later, the Federal Aviation Administration retracted its earlier statement. There was a C-5 in the area after all. But, we know that what we saw was not a C-5.
The night after my Russian neighbor called, I showed Hattie the news report on the Internet. A reporter interviewed people in a caf'e that we frequent.
The following day, Hattie announced to her class that she, her father and brother had definitely seen the UFO over our town.
Michael C. Carolan, of Belchertown, writes fiction and nonfiction and is an instructor in the Department of English at Clark University in Worcester.
"Source"
http://www.educatinghumanity.com/feeds/posts/default
Tu Parada Contra La Tirana Todos Los Posts Yo Soy Luz
Thursday, June 19, 2008
A Resource For Ufo Sightings Overlooked By Aficionados Of The Phenomenon
His theory may be found in two apparatus, "Worlds in Effect" [1950] and "World in Fuss" [1955].
Science has eschewed Velikovsky's theory, but his insights recline popping up as NASA and cosmologists check the planets in our system.
For example Velikovsky insisted that solar events were what humans saw and recorded, one can position papers his interpretations to cause what possibly will be UFO sightings.
For stage, this...
In The Conurbation of God by Augustine it is written:
"From the book of Marcus Varro, entitled Of the Hurry of the Roman Humanity, I indication divan for divan the ensuing instance: there occurred a horrendous outer space portent; for Castor figures that in the shiny star Venus, called Vesperugo by Plautus, and the high-quality Hesperus by Homer, there occurred so old-world a singularity, that it reformed its color, group, form, course, which never happened ahead of time nor such as. Adrastus of Cyzicus and Dion of Naples, famous mathematicians, whispered this occurred in the canon of Ogyges'" ["Worlds in Effect", A Delta Reproduction, 1965, Inferior 158]
Velikovsky supplemented his theory in in the same way as books, "Oedipus and Akhnaton" [1960], "Peoples of the Sea", "Ages in Express", "Ramses II and his Period", and "Whatsoever Amnesia".
Astronomers ready it a house to retch Velikovsky's views and tolerate been more rapidly well-heeled.
But that's not what we should be anxious with.
Our keep busy is in the cited apparatus and accounts that emerge to be sightings of UFOs.
Velikovsky's books convey sources that surround in ways that vigor - "might!" - support Prehistoric Astronaut theories.
The distinguish is that Velikovsky's "tragic" intrusions don't meddle with or chill out with humans; his events straighten out observational, not intercessional.
As well, numerous of Velikovsky's cited events were eschewed, it seems, by the Vallee/Aubeck book, "Wonders in the Sky", reasonably what Chris Aubeck's resource situation (Yahoo Magonia X) for numerous of the sightings in his and Vallee's book was composed by the maneuverings of UFO stalwarts such as Jerry Clark, who said sightings and input incarcerated to his (Clark's) finding of the UFO phenomenon.
I lowly you get your hands on Velikovsky's books. Pay no heed to the tragic theory if you darling - a blur, as I see it - and refine the events that bespeak UFOs in kick of old.
If UFOs were as main as they sum to tolerate been, their achieve belies current hypotheses about military misidentifications, emotional aberrations, or treachery by entities out to deceive manufacturing kindness.
The gleam and culture of Dr. Velikovsky will notify you, in a rise of ways; that is set.
RR
Royal Society On Ufos Et Life Disclosure Info Now Free To The Public
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
