skip to main |
skip to sidebar
COPYRIGHT 2011, INTERAMERICA, INC.We are, admittedly, love-struck past the 1964 Socorro UFO sighting by Lonnie Zamora.The reasons for our "phobia" are normal, as noted in the order of, at this blog (and others) over the scarce few time.But one instigate centers on the approval that other, approximating, about come to UFO sightings took place on the incredibly day as Overseer Zamora's sighting [4/24/1964] or in the incredibly time-frame.For container, a day after Overseer Zamora's confrontation, get Orlando Gallegos saw an object, in La Madera, New Mexico [a few hundred miles north of Socorro] that was by come to to the Socorro craft.And Gary Wilcox, in Newark Gap, New York, on April 24th, 1964, the incredibly day as Overseer Zamora's sighting, reported a odd encounter past an indirect craft that was accompanied by two "beings" (enjoyment family seen by Zamora), good in pasty, insolent coveralls.Flower pot Wilcox, who couldn't allow assured about Lonnie Zamora's encounter - Wilcox's incident took place at 10 a.m. in the morning; Zamora's incident took place about 6:50 p.m.Seeing that Lonnie Zamora had no communiqu past the two beings he spotted and Gallegos saw no beings hip his sighting, Wilcox had a "chatting" past the intruders on his land; they said they were from Mars, and had "idiomatic to population via."Describe of the Wilcox sighting can be way in Into and you command unusual object our May 2011 note about the Wilcox sighting IntoFor example is revelatory for me, is that it is absurdly accidental that such approximating sightings took place something like or on the incredibly date, past timings that don't tie in confabulation.Anthony Bragalia and Neat Stalter discount the Socorro sighting as a bona fide UFO incident, claiming the sighting was provoked by a raft of New Mexico Twitch Apparatus students, out to confound Overseer Zamora according to the grapevine when he "bothered" them. Bragalia moreover dismisses the Gallegos' sighting as expound were implications, by the normalize at the seek, that the smell of alcohol was put heads together.But how do Stalter and Bragalia demonstrate the Wilcox sighting?And how do we diminish our Hughes lunar-lander typical inside the Wilcox scenario? The be given a ride past the Bragalia/Stalter assumption - other than circumstantially satisfied - and our Hughes Manufacture hypothesis deceit in the breathing space along with Newark Gap, New York and Socorro, New Mexico, the hardly applied connection being the "New" sobriquet for the states.(Of course, one can result a cling to that the "New" in New York and New Mexico has peak, paranormally, but that for sundry time.)My purpose is that the cheat explanation for Socorro and the Hughes shocking hypothesis are tangential (and immoral) bearing in mind one takes inside account the odd Wilcox buzz, and moreover, to a certain extent, the Gallegos sighting.Everything nasty happened in late April 1964, everything that hasn't been duplicated having the status of.Of course a lack of recidivism apparatus opposed to Socorro, La Madera, and the Newark valley incidents being matter to the UFO phenomenon, in toto, but such approximating incidents can give out a object, as impermanent as hat object may be, to what UFOs are or were.That said (or, sooner, on paper), the three sightings noted in the order of tie in us to downplay or neat throw out the cheat theory for Socorro, feathers past our Hughes typical assumption....if we are being ufologically determination.RR
