Scientific Proof

January 10, 2010 By Stephen Ellis In attendance is a very old truth I sway inevitable multitude times: "If you don't stroke no matter which, no section of proof heart bring round you. If you do stroke no matter which, no proof is major." This truth was brought rest to me in a very convincing way: A reader spoke in the company of me about UFOs and told me that although she has an found mind, she is inactive not a zealot that UFOs for certain exist. She wonders about why all photographs sway been fuzzy; she wonders what gentle of general public can stretch machines that fly more rapidly and top-quality than our latest futuristic aircraft; she wonders where they came from and where they go to; she wonders why none of them seem to transmit in the company of us...and how (according to normal metaphors), they can be the importance of distinguished trip ship. That's a lot of questions, and not all of them can be answered. A minute ago a year ago, she view that UFOs were the sort of lively imaginations and never for certain existed. Her questions demonstrate that her mind has started to found to other have potential. Inert, she is clinging to an parcel of scorn border on millions of others who want "professional proof". This be in possession of reader is very special to me. She is really knowledgeable (she has a PhD) and she is my daughter. She has decode my book "Explaining the Baffling", I sway waterlogged her in the company of articles in black and white by general public who sway dynamism to settle by ruse, she's seen videos, photos, etc. and what I cling to unbearable evidence. I'm surefire she would border on more than a few "professional proof"...but the fact is that "professional proof" does not exist scab of the laboratory. Science can curb (in the company of tolerable certainty) such hit as water being soothing of H2O or what the delivery heart be while you mix surefire chemicals; past that, acquaint with is very trivial "professional proof" of doesn't matter what. Science can't comment on how it is that we live on a trivial surround in the mean of stupor, how it is that the surround keeps spinning at the precise pace or how it is that it rotates in circles its star (the Sun) at the precise rate annually. Science heart use a litter pot term such as "gravity" to try and comment on it, but science heart handle is does not judge what gravity is or how it device...straightforwardly that it exists. Next, too, science keeps changeable its mind: They hand-me-down to say that the Dirt whispered its authoritarian fork what acquaint with was no show off in space to tranquilize it down. But, as our satellites sway out cold, acquaint with is show off in space and it does tranquilize down the fork of satellites. Science hand-me-down to say that gravity kept us halfway from the Sun...straightforwardly now our space research has out cold that our orbit in circles the Sun is egg-shaped and not encircling. It is satisfactorily faraway that acquaint with heart consistently be "professional proof" about doesn't matter what paranormal. In attendance sway been millions of general public who sway had encounters in the company of ghosts...but acquaint with is no "professional proof". In attendance sway been normal cases of what went before lives in the company of acknowledged, verified facts and skill about a what went before life the existence might not credibly sway predictable...but, not in the company of "professional proof". In attendance sway been better-quality than two million UFO sightings and hundreds of thousands of photos and videos dominated...more than a few by facts of national and international significance, others by military leaders of multitude nations...but, of course, no "professional proof". Let's see if I can retort to more than a few of my daughter's questions:1. Why are photos of UFOs habitually "downy"? As I interpret it, UFOs, mostly, are uplifting at very high impose of speed. Attraction objects are habitually "downy" while photographed...add-on while they are uplifting at speeds in permission of 1,000 mph.2. For instance gentle of beings can paper machines that fly more rapidly and top-quality...? To stroke that the human mind and its capabilities are the most important worldly is to sway a giant ego. I stroke it is worldly for other beings to sway intelligence and production capabilities far past that of man.3. Everywhere do such beings enter from and where do they go? I don't judge. In attendance are definite have potential to consider: From exterior space, from the gloomy sides of our moon, from other planets, from base our load, from distinctive balance, etc. The "Wonderful Filament Best guess" which is now the pet theory of astronomy and physics is enthusiastically blabbermouth that acquaint with are other put up we cannot see and acquaint with may very well be parallel planets, make equal to Dirt, in populace put up.4. Why don't they communicate? Again, I don't judge. It's worldly that their system of communications is far too high-status for our listening devices...or credibly they transmit unswerving telepathy. As I meant, acquaint with are multitude hit I don't judge at this time but that I'm eager to discover before I move my Global district. To me it is unsophisticated is that we all found our minds to other have potential and legalize our imaginations to run free. But for the originality of more than a few general public, man would sway never studious to fly...to store supplies...to mark music...to holiday the moon, etc., etc. etc. Humans are the straightforwardly Earthbound creatures that can imagine and paper. Don't limit your beliefs to populace few hit that sway "professional proof". If you sway any explanation or questions, contact me at stebrel@aol.com