Jose Caravaca, our Spanish be involved with, conjectures that evident of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) stage scenes of abduction by, we show, extraterrestrial set.
The paintings less than, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or spherical craft:
This painting (less than), from Tassili, is frequently cited by Gray Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from outdoor the Earth:
And in the orangey painting particularly, one sees that precise "hat" on a organism being hard someplace.
Were the helmets considered necessary for travel outdoor the Earth's atmosphere?
Were the helmets obviously space helmets? Or ingredient of premature technical garb?
Senor Caravaca's see is sensational, but is stage altered explanation for the images?
We don't distinguish an anthropological rag definite.
Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article second hand by Josh Sordelet, in his redeployment about Tassili a few years ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human facts before round heads, frequently look headdresses of horns or down in the dumps."
Dr. Gualco is truism the depictions are caricatures of spruce, but the Tassili paintings didn't mockery the plants to be had, or whatsoever else.
The humans pictured are (innovatively) stylized, but not to a touch that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are celebrated and their femininity compared to pictures of men is bright.
So why would the painters mode headdresses (helmets!) that are cloistered from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" to the same degree no matter which else isn't?
Jose Caravaca's keen eye may convene found no matter which -- no matter which to storage space AA theory and Perplexing Spasm stories in addition.
