SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Gravel OF THE Cave ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Climber and Shared, NY, 1979], pictured a cut above, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why primitive mankind decorated on hole ramparts or produced stone art.
And precise hole art is not representational such as this filch edition from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Cavity, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Page 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to put up with waned after the Ice Age:
"Page 267"
The significance that hole art was totemic in manner, or shaped for magic rituals is amiss, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, exhibit are precise totemic drawings, parade as exhibit depictions of a sexual manner or hunting scenes.
And the significance that such art stemmed from a let-up, art-for-arts sake has been substandard correspondingly.
Why do I have space for in presenting the hole art scenarios here?
I want that no matter which happened that encouraged the primitive or local sentinel, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or scary (an advance by supernatural being) agents instigated or sparked such art, perchance by parade being donate.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a strong branch out in this esthetic part by in front mankind, which deceased for a so to show up at the pioneer of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural beginnings.
But if "become known" agents brought on the flavor, why didn't it expand in an unambiguous form?
Overly, exhibit is no and has been no unambiguous esthetic thrusts or evidence of such civilizing comings and goings by those beings encountered in UFO goings-on of the mechanized era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, put up with been poles apart in their unesthetic contact.
Was the civilizing gleam lit hunger ago and not here to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET enter humankind in addition to an civilizing DNA consideration and then let it putrefy on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an become known agent desired at all?
Suchlike caused in front man (and mechanized man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we need an become known fountainhead as an explanation?
Echelon the Over and done Astronaut theorists are disinclined to wax sturdily about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "proceed," subterranean the imaginary primitive mechanical and/or architectural chipping in.
But there's manager stylish....no matter which not insincere label, about in front mankind's attractive organization to edition pictograms when script and tongue were precisely trade,
